이/가
이/가: The Subject Particle That Marks New Information
Marks the grammatical subject, and presents it as new information the listener did not already have.
How to form it
| When | Form | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Noun ends in a consonant | 이 | 사람 → 사람이 |
| Noun ends in a vowel | 가 | 날씨 → 날씨가 |
| With 저 / 나 / 누구 | contracts | 저 → 제가 · 나 → 내가 · 누구 → 누가 |
Textbooks say 이/가 is “the subject particle,” which is true and tells you almost nothing about when to use it.
Here is the version that actually helps: 이/가 points at something and presents it as news.
The form
Same consonant/vowel split as every Korean particle:
Ends in a consonant → 이
Ends in a vowel → 가
사람 → 사람이
날씨 → 날씨가
Three pronouns contract, and you should learn them as words rather than deriving them:
| 저 + 가 | 제가 (not 저가) |
| 나 + 가 | 내가 (not 나가) |
| 누구 + 가 | 누가 (not 누구가) |
What it actually does
The clearest demonstration is answering a question.
누가 왔어요? — Who came?
민수가 왔어요. ✅ — Minsu came.
The question asks for information you do not have — which person. New information takes 가.
Now try answering with 는:
민수는 왔어요. — Minsu, at least, came.
Still grammatical. But it no longer answers the question — it has become a comparison, implying someone else did not come. That is 은/는 vs 이/가 doing its job, and it is the wrong job here.
Flip it around and 는 becomes correct:
민수 뭐 해요? — What’s Minsu up to?
민수는 자고 있어요. ✅ — Minsu’s sleeping.
Minsu is already in the conversation. He is not the news. The sleeping is.
Weather, bodies, and noticing things
These take 이/가, and they are fixed enough to memorise as phrases:
- 날씨가 좋아요 — The weather’s nice.
- 배가 고파요 — I’m hungry.
- 머리가 아파요 — I have a headache.
- 시간이 없어요 — I don’t have time.
The pattern underneath: all of these are things you are noticing right now. 배고프다 literally says the belly is hungry — the belly is the subject, and it is what the sentence is presenting.
Switch to 날씨는 좋아요 and you have said “the weather, at least, is nice” — implying something else about the day is not. Sometimes that is what you want. Usually it is not.
The one that surprises people
A few adjectives take 이/가 where English uses an object:
- 커피가 좋아요 — I like coffee.
- 돈이 필요해요 — I need money.
- 한국어가 어려워요 — Korean is hard.
In Korean these say coffee is good (to me), money is needed. The thing you would call the object in English is the grammatical subject here. Do not try to force English structure onto them — learn them as they are.
Note 저는 커피를 좋아해요 also exists, with 좋아하다 rather than 좋다. Different verb, different particle.
A rule you can use today
- Answering “who?” or “what?” → 이/가
- Weather, body, time, sudden noticing → 이/가
- Something already being discussed → 은/는 vs 이/가
- Comparing two things → 은/는 vs 이/가 on both
You will still get it wrong sometimes. Everyone does, for years, and it almost never blocks understanding. But once you hear that 이/가 is pointing and 은/는 is framing, the choice stops feeling random.
Do not confuse it with
Taught alongside this
In the Sejong course this appears in 회사원이 아니에요 — Sejong Korean 1, Unit 2, on the theme of 가족. These come with it:
Words used above
Quick check
No sign-up, no score saved — just see if it stuck.
1. Someone asks 누가 왔어요? (Who came?) How do you answer?


2. Which is the natural way to say 'I'm hungry'?


3. Why does 저 + 가 become 제가?


Common questions
So when do I use 은/는 instead?
When the thing is already in the conversation and you are saying something about it. 이/가 brings something in; 은/는 picks up what is already there. See 은/는 for the full contrast.
Why is it 제가 and not 저가?
저 + 가 contracts to 제가. The same happens with 나 → 내가 and 누구 → 누가. There are only these three, so memorise them as words rather than as a rule.
Can I drop the particle?
In casual speech, constantly — 밥 먹었어? drops everything. But drop it only once you can hear what you are dropping, or you lose a distinction you cannot yet make.
Does 이/가 always mark the subject?
Almost always, but watch for 아니다 and a few adjectives like 좋다 and 필요하다, where what looks like an object in English takes 가: 커피가 좋아요, 돈이 필요해요.
Seen in the wild
Lessons where this pattern showed up in real Korean — news, slang, drama lines.
Geumsujeo and Heuksujeo: Korea's Spoon-Class Words
금수저 and 흙수저 remix the English 'silver spoon' into a home-grown ladder of family background words. Here is where the metaphor came from — and how people actually say it.
Korean Age in 2026: What Changed, and What Didn't
The law switched to international age in June 2023 — but three age systems still exist, and the one people use in conversation was never the legal one anyway.
정 (情): The Attachment Korean Has a Word For
Not love, not friendship, not loyalty. 정 is what builds between people simply because time passed — including people you do not particularly like.
내로남불: Four Syllables for a Double Standard
Romance when I do it, an affair when you do it. A compressed sentence that became a noun, and then became the standard word in Korean political argument.
눈치: The Skill Korea Assumes You Already Have
Not tact, not intuition, not reading the room — something narrower and more demanding. Here is what 눈치 actually measures, and why foreigners are told they lack it.
무궁화 꽃이 피었습니다: The Line, and the Real Game
Five words that carry a national flower, a subject particle and a formal past tense. Here is what the chant actually says, and the playground game it comes from.